Agent Wealth HubFree public resources
中文 EN العربية

Back to catalog / Agent workflows

Compare tool designs against a task set

Run agent tool calls on a fixed task set and measure success, latency, and tool feedback.

Goal

Goal: Run agent tool calls on a fixed task set and measure success, latency, and tool feedback.

Steps

  1. Prepare answer-checkable task fixtures and candidate tool schemas; pin model, prompt, and run limits. [tool-eval]
  2. Run each task through agent_loop(prompt, tools=...); record tool sequence, inputs, latency, and final answer. [tool-eval]
  3. Check answers against expected outputs and summarize actionable feedback on names/parameters/descriptions; repeat cases to estimate variance. [tool-eval]

How to verify

Report per-case success/failure, tool use, and latency; compare schema revisions on the same baseline.

Troubleshooting

Count unparsable output as a failed check, refine the contract, and assess tool quality from validated results and execution evidence.

Permissions

Prerequisites

Permissions

Limitations

Model feedback is diagnostic, not ground truth; cost grows with task and tool count.

Pinned upstream source

https://github.com/anthropics/anthropic-cookbook/blob/9c1e493ddd2b82df399d2a61b9c806c539e18be6/tool_evaluation/tool_evaluation.ipynb

Repository
anthropics/anthropic-cookbook
File path
tool_evaluation/tool_evaluation.ipynb
Pinned commit
9c1e493ddd2b82df399d2a61b9c806c539e18be6
Source checked
2026-10-14 · Reviewed against the pinned upstream source

Repository metrics

These values describe the upstream repository, not popularity or likes for an individual skill or playbook.

Stars
Not collected
Forks
Not collected
Observed at
Not collected

No metrics snapshot is available yet.

License: MIT

Main topic

Turn ecommerce campaign materials into a reviewable weekly brief

Related resources